Virgie Arthur Had a Baby with Her Step Brother

Share      

As Larry Birkhead’s custody hearing looms with grandma Virgie Arthur standing largely in the way, TMZ has dug up an interesting family tree, turns out Virgie liked her stepbrother a whole lot.

Here’s the deal: Virgie’s mom, Paralee, married a guy named Melvin and had Virgie. In another part of Texas, a guy named George William Tacker got together with this chick named Betty Jo and had a son named David Luther Tacker. Then Paralee and George got married, so Virgie and David became their stepkids. They were all one big happy family, maybe too happy, because Virgie hooked up with her stepbro to produce David Luther Tacker, Jr.

So, David Sr. is Virgie’s stepbrother and her baby daddy.

Even though George and Virgie are not related by blood, would you have a baby with your step brother? Does this count as incest?

Are Virgie’s moral values an issue in her bid for joint custody of her grand child Dannielynn?

Related Posts:

• Larry Birkhead Spent $3,000 on Anna Nicole Smith Lingerie
• Larry Birkhead and Dannielynn Moving out of LA
• Larry Birkhead Cashes in on Dannielynn
• Larry Birkhead Gets Down and Dirty
• Prince Von Anhalt is Number One

Posted on April 19, 2007 at 11:46 am (PST)

Tags: Larry Birkhead

3 Responses to “Virgie Arthur Had a Baby with Her Step Brother”

someone says:
April 20, 2007 at 4:12 am
Virgie Arthur didn’t make an effort to be in Annas life for years, now shes trying to get custody of her baby girl. I think Larry should have the last decision, I don’t think it should have even got to court. I think the court should throw her case out! I could understand if she didn’t have a daddy, but she does, and hes very capable IMO, of taking care of Dannielynn by himself. $$$$$$$ thats what it is about
Reply
Meredith says:
April 19, 2007 at 3:42 pm
I think it’s nasty to sleep with a step sibling,but it’s not incest, and it doesn’t necessarily make her her an immoral person, particularly if they grew up seperatly and their parents married when the kids were older.
The way she treated her daughter, that’s far more questionably moral.
Reply
MICKEY DE LOTTO says:
April 19, 2007 at 2:29 pm
IF VIRGIE ARTHUR GETS ANYWHERE NEAR THAT BABY, A TERRIBLE INJUSTICE WILL BE DONE.
ANY WOMAN THAT’S MARRIED 5 TIMES DOESN’T SEEM TOO STABLE TO ME. ADD HER DAUGHTER’S HATRED FOR HER AND I DON’T THINK IT’S A PRETTY PICTURE AT ALL.
SHE EVEN LOOKS LIKE A WITCH.
LET LARRY HAVE HIS DAUGHTER AND “GET LOST, VIRGIE”!
Reply