HollywoodGrind - Celebrity gossip juicy celebrity rumors celebrity scandals Hollywood gossip blog » Watchmen

Shadow Hare Super Hero Amateurs

Hollywood Grind — Fri, 01 May 2009 19:13:31 +0000

Watchmen has inspired real life nerds, with a desire to dress up, and a need for attention to dress as a cross between professional wrestlers, and fictional super hero crime fighters, who walk the streets in local block watch gangs.

The people in the video look more like they suffer from mental illness than super heroes.

Watchmen Mania Hits London

Hollywood Grind — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:24:04 +0000

A 72 feet high, and 100 feet wide, giant water screen was created to promote the Watchmen movie, and to project the smiley face from Watchmen, and the image of Dr Manhattan onto. The images appeared in the middle on the Thames river between the London Eye and the Shell Building.

Are you going to see Watchmen this weekend?

Watchmen World Premiere – Video

Hollywood Grind — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:20:00 +0000

The Watchmen movie release is almost upon us. The actors who attended the premiere gave us more insight into the movie concept. Watchmen doesn’t seem to be an ordinary superhero movie. We are definitely going to see this one.

Rorschach Documentary – Watchmen Movie

Hollywood Grind — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:21:56 +0000

The Watchmen movie is almost upon us, and after the movie is released each character will be analyzed until it’s nauseating, but it could develop a huge cult like following as many science fiction tales have developed. One of the characters central to the movie is Rorschach, who is discussed in this mini documentary.

Watchmen Legal Fight Settled

Hollywood Grind — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:48:41 +0000

The Watchmen movie will hit theaters on March 6 for sure now that a legal dispute has been settled between two studios. Warner Brothers made the movie, and fox sued them alleging copyright violations. The out of court settlement avoids a trial, and gives Fox a lump sum payment plus a percentage of box-office receipts.

The whole dispute it appears was caused by producer Larry Gordon who shopped the story to Warner Brothers after Fox refused to make the movie. After the December 24, 2008 court decision, which could have derailed plans to release the movie on March 6, 2009, Warner Bros. filed court documents stating its intent to go after Gordon for the costs of this legal battle.

We’ll be one of the first in line to see Watchmen. We want to know if all the effort, and risk, was worth it in making this movie.

Lloyd Levin Speaks Out on Watchmen Legal Battle

Hollywood Grind — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:59:03 +0000

Lloyd Levin, one of the producers of the Watchmen movie, that is tied up in a court battle between Fox and Warner Bros., who made the movie, has spoken out in an open letter. Levin talks about how difficult it was to make the movie, and how Fox appears now to be trying to stop the movie after seeing how it may become a blockbuster. The letter is below:

Who is right? In the Watchmen dispute between Warner Brothers and Fox that question is being discussed, analyzed, argued, tried and ruled on in a court of law. That’s one way to answer the question – It is a fallback position in our society for parties in conflict to resolve disputes. And there are teams of lawyers and a highly regarded Federal Judge trying to do just that, which obviates any contribution I could make towards answering the "who is right" question within a legal context. But after 15 plus years of involvement in the project, and a decade more than that working in the movie business, I have another perspective, a personal perspective that I believe important to have on the public record.

No one is more keenly aware of the irony of this dispute than Larry Gordon and I who have been trying to get this movie made for many years. There’s a list of people who have rejected the viability of a movie based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon’s classic graphic novel that reads like a who’s who of Hollywood.

"We’ve been told the graphic novel is unfilmable.

After 9/11 some felt the story’s themes were too close to reality ever to be palatable to a mainstream audience.

There were those who considered the project but who wished it were somehow different: Could it be a buddy movie, or a team-up movie or could it focus on one main character; did it have to be so dark; did so many people have to die; could it be stripped of its flashback structure; could storylines be eliminated; could new storylines be invented; did it have to be so long; could the blue guy put clothes on… The list of dissatisfactions for what Watchmen is was as endless as the list of suggestions to make it something it never was.

Also endless are the list of studio rejections we accrued over the years. Larry and I developed screenplays at five different studios. We had two false starts in production on the movie. We were involved with prominent and commercial directors. Big name stars were interested. In one instance hundreds of people were employed, sets were being built – An A-list director and top artists in the industry were given their walking papers when the studio financing the movie lost faith.

After all these years of rejection, this is the same project, the same movie, over which two studios are now spending millions of dollars contesting ownership. Irony indeed, and then some.

Through the years, inverse of the lack of studio faith has been the passionate belief by many many individuals – movie professionals who were also passionate fans of the graphic novel – who, yes, wanted to work on the film, but more for reasons of just wanting to see the movie get made, to see this movie get made and made right, donated their time and talent to help push the film forward: Writers gave us free screenplay drafts; conceptual art was supplied by illustrators, tests were performed gratis by highly respected actors and helped along and put together by editors, designers, prop makers and vfx artists; we were the recipients of donated studio and work space, lighting and camera equipment. Another irony, given the commercial stakes implied by the pitched legal dispute between Fox and Warners, is that for years Watchmen has been a project that has survived on the fumes of whatever could be begged, borrowed and stolen – A charity case for all intents and purposes. None of that effort, none of that passion and emotional involvement, is considered in the framework of this legal dispute.

From my point of view, the flashpoint of this dispute, came in late spring of 2005. Both Fox and Warner Brothers were offered the chance to make Watchmen. They were submitted the same package, at the same time. It included a cover letter describing the project and its history, budget information, a screenplay, the graphic novel, and it made mention that a top director was involved.

And it’s at this point, where the response from both parties could not have been more radically different.

The response we got from Fox was a flat "pass." That’s it. An internal Fox email documents that executives there felt the script was one of the most unintelligible pieces of shit they had read in years. Conversely, Warner Brothers called us after having read the script and said they were interested in the movie – yes, they were unsure of the screenplay, and had many questions, but wanted to set a meeting to discuss the project, which they promptly did. Did anyone at Fox ask to meet on the movie? No. Did anyone at Fox express any interest in the movie? No. Express even the slightest interest in the movie? Or the graphic novel? No.

From there, the executives at Warner Brothers, who weren’t yet completely comfortable with the movie, made a deal to acquire the movie rights and we all started to creatively explore the possibility of making Watchmen. We discussed creative approaches and started offering the movie to directors, our former director having moved on by then. After a few director submissions, Zack Snyder came onboard, well before the release of his movie 300. In fact, well before its completion. This was a gut, creative call by Larry, me and the studio… Zack didn’t have a huge commercial track record, yet we all felt he was the right guy for the movie.

Warner Brothers continued to support, both financially and creatively, the development of the movie. And eventually, after over a year of work, they agreed to make the film, based on a script that, for what it’s worth, was by and large very similar to the one Fox initially read and deemed an unintelligible piece of shit.

Now here’s the part that has to be fully appreciated, if for nothing more than providing insight into producing movies in Hollywood: The Watchmen script was way above the norm in length, near 150 pages, meaning the film could clock in at close to 3 hours, the movie would not only be R rated but a hard R – for graphic violence and explicit sex – would feature no stars, and had a budget north of $100M. We also asked Warner Brothers to support an additional 1 to 1.5 hours of content incurring additional cost that would tie in with the movie but only be featured in DVD iterations of the film. Warners supported the whole package and I cannot begin to emphasize how ballsy and unprecedented a move this was on the part of a major Hollywood studio. Unheard of. And would another studio in Hollywood, let alone a studio that didn’t show one shred of interest in the movie, not one, have taken such a risk? Would they ever have made such a commitment, a commitment to a film that defied all conventional wisdom?

Only the executives at Fox can answer that question. But if they were to be honest, their answer would have to be "No."

Shouldn’t Warner Brothers be entitled to the spoils – if any — of the risk they took in supporting and making Watchmen? Should Fox have any claim on something they could have had but chose to neither support nor show any interest in?

Look at it another way… One reason the movie was made was because Warner Brothers spent the time, effort and money to engage with and develop the project. If Watchmen was at Fox the decision to make the movie would never have been made because there was no interest in moving forward with the project.

Does a film studio have the right to stand in the way of an artistic endeavor and determine that it shouldn’t exist? If the project had been sequestered at Fox, if Fox had any say in the matter, Watchmen simply wouldn’t exist today, and there would be no film for Fox to lay claim on. It seems beyond cynical for the studio to claim ownership at this point.

By his own admission, Judge Feess is faced with an extremely complex legal case, with a contradictory contractual history, making it difficult to ascertain what is legally right. Are there circumstances here that are more meaningful, which shed light on what is ultimately just, to be taken into account when assessing who is right? In this case, what is morally right, beyond the minutiae of decades-old contractual semantics, seems clear cut.

For the sake of the artists involved, for the hundreds of people, executives and filmmakers, actors and crew, who invested their time, their money, and dedicated a good portion of their lives in order to bring this extraordinary project to life, the question of what is right is clear and unambiguous – Fox should stand down with its claim.

My father, who was a lawyer and a stickler for the minutiae of the law, was always quick to teach me that the determination of what is right and wrong was not the sole purview of the courts. I bet someone at Fox had a parent like mine who instilled the same sense of fairness and justice in them.

Lloyd Levin"

Japanese Watchmen Trailer

Hollywood Grind — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:27:45 +0000

The Japanese Watchmen movie video trailer has some footage unseen in previous trailers.

New Watchmen Trailer

Hollywood Grind — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:35:01 +0000

The Watchmen movie opens on 3-6-2009, and after seeing this new trailer, I’ll want to see it the first night it opens. This is going to be a blockbuster at a time of the year that blockbusters are not expected.

Watchmen Movie Trailer

Hollywood Grind — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:04:15 +0000

The Watchmen movie trailer was shown at the Spike Scream Awards, and it look like a HUGE BLOCKBUSTER.

The video above is just the trailer, but the video below includes director Zac Snyder presenting the trailer for the first time.

What an amazing movie this is going to be! I embedded the trailer twice just to make sure one is still here in case the other gets removed.

Watchmen Movie Delayed by Legal Fight

Hollywood Grind — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:54:02 +0000

The new superhero movie Watchmen is scheduled to hit theaters in March of 2009, but that date is now in question. Warner Bros., who made the movie, was sued by 20th Century Fox.

Fox claims they had an agreement to Watchmen rights, and Warner Bros. say Fox gave up their rights to Watchmen in a 1994 agreement.

A federal judge says the Fox case can be heard by the court, and Fox may ask for an injunction, preventing the movie to be shown until the case is settled. To avoid that scenario, Warner Bros. could just settle the case by cutting Fox in on the deal.

The Watchmen movie looks really good, and could be a big blockbuster, which is why Fox brought the case to court.

HollywoodGrind - Celebrity gossip juicy celebrity rumors celebrity scandals Hollywood gossip blog » Watchmen

Shadow Hare Super Hero Amateurs

Related posts:

Watchmen Mania Hits London

Related posts:

Watchmen World Premiere – Video

Related posts:

Rorschach Documentary – Watchmen Movie

Related posts:

Watchmen Legal Fight Settled

Related posts:

Lloyd Levin Speaks Out on Watchmen Legal Battle

Related posts:

Japanese Watchmen Trailer

Related posts:

New Watchmen Trailer

Related posts:

Watchmen Movie Trailer

Related posts:

Watchmen Movie Delayed by Legal Fight

Related posts: