Last evening Life&Style reported that Casey Aldridge and Jamie Lynn Spears had broken up, but I didn’t believe it. Now I find Casey confirmed the split on his MySpace. Of course, I am assuming this is his MySpace page, but I’m not so sure it is because it says he is 17 years-old, when in fact Casey is 19 years-old. If it really is his MySpace page then maybe it is true then that Casey and Jamie have already broken up. Maybe it’s also true that Casey isn’t the father of the baby. Jamie Lynn did say recently she has "lots of guy friends," and "no serious boyfriend." Lynne Spears must be so proud to have a grandbaby with so many daddies. I’m still not completely convinced Casey and Jamie Lynn have broken up unless they say so themselves. In fact there is zero evidence to support a breakup, especially since both Casey and Jamie Lynn’s families have all been speaking out about the pregnancy.

Jamie Lynn Spears aunt, Chanda McGovern, is speaking out and she says Jamie may have gotten pregnant on purpose, to get "me time" amid the Britney mania.

In a tell-all interview, Chanda McGovern says, "I believe Jamie Lynn is entirely too young to be sexually active. She’s got her whole life ahead of her, she’s just a baby herself and 16 is entirely too young to be sexually active."

Jamie Lynn should’ve learned a lesson from her big sister, and troubled mom, Britney Spears. "I hope it would be a reason for her not to have gotten pregnant," Chanda says of Britney’s problems with her divorce and child custody.

As for why Jamie Lynn could’ve allowed this to happen, her aunt blames the Britney frenzy that’s consumed the family and taken the spotlight away from the youngest Spears child. "I do believe Jamie Lynn may be feeling the disruption of the family with everything that’s going on," she says. "It may be one of the reasons she went out and did what she did, and whether she got pregnant on purpose or by accident, that’s the reason she went out and rebelled. She wants a little bit of ’me’ attention, with everything that’s going on with Britney like it is."

Chanda’s daughter, Miranda, who is Jamie Lynn’s first cousin also spoke out. Looking sad and disappointed, the 11-year-old said, "I was kind of shocked when I found out, I never figured that would happen to her at such a young age. I really don’t want it to happen to me."

Even an 11 year-old girl understands that a 16 year-old getting pregnant is WRONG. According to Jamie Lynn’s aunt, Jamie got pregnant to get more attention. Well, she’s getting a lot now. I wonder what Chanda thinks about Lynne Spears allowing her 16 year-old daughter to sleep with 19 year-old Casey Aldridge? Are the cops going to make a statement as to whether or not this is statutory rape, or is the law turning a blind eye?

Apparently Jamie Spears, the father of Jamie Lynn Spears, is "furious" with Jamie Lynn and ex-wife Lynne for selling the story of her pregnancy to OK! magazine. A source said:

"He put his foot down and refused to take any money and ’profit off of his children.’ Lynne didn’t care. Jamie is devastated by the news his 16 year-old daughter is pregnant. He’s extremely depressed and feels Jamie Lynn ruined her life."

The statements coming from the Spears family sound like they were written for a comedy show. Daddy Jamie is so mad he’ll say he doesn’t want the money, but the check will be written out to Lynne Spears, and he’ll spend it just like the rest of them, especially since Jamie Lynn is only 16 and her parents control her money until she’s 18.

Jamie Lynn Spears gave an interview to OK! magazine for which it is assumed she was paid, and now we know how and when she is getting paid. When you’ve done something wrong just say it was for the baby. TMZ reports:

TMZ has learned that Jamie Lynn Spears was not paid for this week’s magazine interview … yet. We’re told the money will change hands down the road — when the baby is born.

Just how did the deal go down? Rewind. Sources close to Britney’s family tell TMZ it all started when Britney melted down on an OK! Magazine photo shoot. Britney’s mom, Lynne, read the article (who didn’t?!) and called OK! personally to thank them "for handling it so well." She stayed in touch with OK!, and called them this week when she learned that news of Jamie’s pregnancy was about to break. Her only requirement? Keep Britney out of it. This is about Jamie Lynn. "She trusted them to do it in a way that would be sympathetic to her daughter," our source says.

We’re told Jamie and mom did not want money, but OK! has agreed to pay $1 million to the younger Spears for a photo shoot when the child is born. Why so little when others have commanded several million? We’re told it’s because Jamie Lynn is not an international star and it’s not worth it to the mag to pay big bucks for something they can’t sell overseas.

Another interesting note: We hear Jamie is further along than the 12 weeks she says in the mag’s article. Expect a spring baby.

So Jamie is getting paid after all, a very healthy sum. So what about being "12 weeks" pregnant? A story by the National Enquirer reported on July 28 claimed Jamie Lynn was pregnant already in July. After the story ran Jamie Lynn’s attorney threatened legal action and sent the following letter to the National Enquirer:

“Ms. Spears is a devout Christian with a spotless reputation, who lives in accordance with the highest moral and ethical standards in accordance with her faith.

There is no “rumor” concerning Ms. Spears’ (non-existent) pregnancy, except perhaps for the baseless “rumor” just now being created by the National Enquirer.

Ms. Spears is not pregnant. It is pathetic for the National Enquirer to attempt to create a wholly baseless “rumor” that Ms. Spears is pregnant, so it can run a malicious story and false story which would be emotionally devastating to a morally upright 16 year old girl.”

Wouldn’t it be amazing if the National Enquirer sued Jamie Lynn for damaging their credibility and reputation by calling a story that was true a lie? If Jamie has her baby in the Spring, then we’ll know for sure she’s a liar, and does not live in accordance with "the highest moral and ethical standards in accordance with her faith."

Kevin Federline was told Jamie Lynn Spears was pregnant before Britney Spears found out when the rest of us did. A source said:

"Kevin knew before Britney that Jamie Lynn is pregnant," a Federline family insider said. "In fact, Britney’s [somewhat estranged] mom Lynne Spears, [who has become tight with Kevin in the wake of her troubles with her daughter and grandchildren], told Kevin about it on Monday, [December 17], because Lynne wanted Kevin to be prepared when Britney found out."

"We’re waiting for the fallout from Britney," the insider added. "Kevin is sure Britney will flip out and blame her mom and dad."

No one in the Spears family seems to trust Britney with inside family information. Trust is an issue, and they trust Kevin.