Johnny Vieira filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles against Vanessa Hudgens claiming she owes him more than $2 million, but his suit is asking for $5 million. Vieira claims in May 2005, he and Hudgens entered into a production agreement to launch Vanessa’s career. Vieira claims they had a deal to "share equally" in the fruits of their labor. He says the agreement was approved by the court because she was a minor.

Vieira says after High School Musical became a hit, she dumped him and they entered into a settlement agreement. He says she’s been violating that deal and owes him more than $2 million. As proof Johnny Vieira provided the picture above sent to him by Vanessa on which she wrote:

"Johnny, thank you for everything, without you, I would be no where, we will make it BIG, Vanessa Hudgens. Sweet."

Brian Schall, Hudgens former attorney, sued her for $150,000 in November of 2007 after he said he helped her earn more than $5 million. Hudgens claimed she was legally uderage (16) at the time she signed the agreement, so she couldn’t be sued.

No more excuses Vanessa.

Vanessa Hudgens has asked for a lawsuit filed in September to be dismissed. The lawsuit alleges she owes her former attorney $150,000. Hudgens’ attorney says she was only 16 when she signed the deal, so the deal is not valid. In his suit, attorney Brian Schall claims he helped Hudgens earn more than $5 million by advancing her funds for her songwriting and recording career. The suit says that Vanessa "has paid some, but not all, of the money owed …"

Court papers filed Monday by Hudgens’ lawyer, Evan N. Spiegel, say California’s Family Code "provides that the contract of a minor is voidable and may be disaffirmed before (age 18) or within a reasonable time afterward," which means Vanessa was too young to sign the deal. The contract in question was initially signed in October of 2005, and Hudgens officially disaffirmed the contract on October 9, according to court documents. A copy of a two-paragraph letter from Hudgens to Schall nullifying their agreement is attached to her court papers, as is a copy of her birth certificate, which states that she was born December 14, 1988. The court papers also say the agreement was with the law offices of Schall, not with Schall himself.

One of our readers already pointed out that Vanessa may not be held to that contract because she was too young. Here’s what HG reader Yirmin Snipe said at the time of our first report about this lawsuit:

Sounds like the lawyer isn’t much of a lawyer… If he was he would know you can’t hold a minor to a contract they signed as a minor… Let me see… 2005 was what 2 years ago and She’s 18 now…. Hmmmm… My spidey sense of math says she was 16 and the lawyer was an idiot.

We have some smart, educated and handsome readers.