OK! Mag Accuses Larry Birkhead of Scheming with Howard

OK! Magazine was set to publish pictures they took of Larry Birkhead and Dannielynn recently for her 1 year birthday, and now they won’t run the photos. I guess that means they won’t pay him for the pictures. The same thing happened recently with a Britney photoshoot where OK! accused Britney of stealing clothes, and wiping up dog poo with a dress. They didn’t pay her either. Here’s more:

“OK! Magazine has uncovered explosive allegations regarding Larry Birkhead, Howard K. Stern and baby Danielynn, prompting the magazine to cancel our exclusive coverage of Danielynn’s first birthday party. OK! has been with Daniellynn since birth — bringing to the world her first meeting with her biological father and first Father’s Day. In keeping with that tradition, we very much looked forward to showing you her first birthday. However, the newly-obtained allegations are detailed, shocking and potentially incriminating. Furthermore, it makes it impossible for OK!, in good conscience, to promote this family’s highly questionable relationship in our pages. Next week’s issue of OK! will bring all of the unfortunate, relevant details to light.”

Furthermore from OK! editor-in-chief Sarah Ivens:
“It breaks my heart that OK! has to pull out of a shoot that would have chronicled the next great chapter of Dannielynn’s life. That sort of celebration is what the magazine enjoys most. But first and foremost, we — and I — care dearly about the well-being of the young one, and my moral obligation lies with her. So, it’s unfortunate, but at the moment, my biggest fear is that Larry and Howard may have tricked us all.”

In order to believe a gossip tabloid would act "in good conscience," you’d also have to believe that politicians don’t lie.