The person who posted this, this photo doesn’t …
Comment posted Miley Cyrus Does More Damage Control by Lan.
The person who posted this, this photo doesn’t show any sexuality at all, also her father was also there on the set! Get your facts straight, she saw it as artistic while you who has a sick mind only sees it as sexual. If she was literally topless then it would be bad but shes not, If you see a naked 8 month old then you see it as cute but if it is a naked 8 year old you automatically call it pornography. Seriously stop this madness!
Recent comments by Lan
- Miley Cyrus in Trouble over Vanity Fair Pics
The person who posted this, this photo doesn’t show any sexuality at all, also her father was also there on the set! Get your facts straight, she saw it as artistic while you who has a sick mind only sees it as sexual. If she was literally topless then it would be bad but shes not, If you see a naked 8 month old then you see it as cute but if it is a naked 8 year old you automatically call it pornography. Seriously stop this madness!
powered by HollywoodGrind
Related posts:
Posted on April 27, 2008 at 8:44 pm(PST)
4 Responses to “The person who posted this, this photo doesn’t …”
© Copyright Hollywood Grind 2006 - 2009. All rights reserved.

My kids adore her, but her parents are idiots for letting her get pictured like she did in that sheet.
She is pasty white and has what appears to be slightly smeared red lipstick, and tossled hair. How porn looking can you get? That is not artistic. That is not art.
Once you start taking your clothes off it just gets easier……..
I said this before and I’ll say it again. Someone is a slut. No offense to those who love her but I just do not like her at all. She deserved it for being such a idiot.
It’s not even showing anything except her back and her arms that is not even half the bad stuff the lindsay does. I am still on Miley’s side no matter what you guys says
The person who posted this, this photo doesn’t show any sexuality at all, also her father was also there on the set! Get your facts straight, she saw it as artistic while you who has a sick mind only sees it as sexual. If she was literally topless then it would be bad but shes not, If you see a naked 8 month old then you see it as cute but if it is a naked 8 year old you automatically call it pornography. Seriously stop this madness!