Jamie Lynn Spears Lied About Pregnancy in July
Jamie Lynn Spears gave an interview to OK! magazine for which it is assumed she was paid, and now we know how and when she is getting paid. When you’ve done something wrong just say it was for the baby. TMZ reports:
TMZ has learned that Jamie Lynn Spears was not paid for this week’s magazine interview … yet. We’re told the money will change hands down the road — when the baby is born.
Just how did the deal go down? Rewind. Sources close to Britney’s family tell TMZ it all started when Britney melted down on an OK! Magazine photo shoot. Britney’s mom, Lynne, read the article (who didn’t?!) and called OK! personally to thank them "for handling it so well." She stayed in touch with OK!, and called them this week when she learned that news of Jamie’s pregnancy was about to break. Her only requirement? Keep Britney out of it. This is about Jamie Lynn. "She trusted them to do it in a way that would be sympathetic to her daughter," our source says.
We’re told Jamie and mom did not want money, but OK! has agreed to pay $1 million to the younger Spears for a photo shoot when the child is born. Why so little when others have commanded several million? We’re told it’s because Jamie Lynn is not an international star and it’s not worth it to the mag to pay big bucks for something they can’t sell overseas.
Another interesting note: We hear Jamie is further along than the 12 weeks she says in the mag’s article. Expect a spring baby.
So Jamie is getting paid after all, a very healthy sum. So what about being "12 weeks" pregnant? A story by the National Enquirer reported on July 28 claimed Jamie Lynn was pregnant already in July. After the story ran Jamie Lynn’s attorney threatened legal action and sent the following letter to the National Enquirer:
“Ms. Spears is a devout Christian with a spotless reputation, who lives in accordance with the highest moral and ethical standards in accordance with her faith.
There is no “rumor” concerning Ms. Spears’ (non-existent) pregnancy, except perhaps for the baseless “rumor” just now being created by the National Enquirer.
Ms. Spears is not pregnant. It is pathetic for the National Enquirer to attempt to create a wholly baseless “rumor” that Ms. Spears is pregnant, so it can run a malicious story and false story which would be emotionally devastating to a morally upright 16 year old girl.”
Wouldn’t it be amazing if the National Enquirer sued Jamie Lynn for damaging their credibility and reputation by calling a story that was true a lie? If Jamie has her baby in the Spring, then we’ll know for sure she’s a liar, and does not live in accordance with "the highest moral and ethical standards in accordance with her faith."
Related posts:
11 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
© Copyright Hollywood Grind 2006 - 2009. All rights reserved.
yall are dumb. the days we’re living in today kids are starting to have sex at the age of 13, she is 16 years old & either way it is her body & just because she’s famous does not mean thatt she cant do what she wants with it. & whether she lies or not its not anyones business anyways.
Comment by lil one. — January 10, 2008 #
please don’t quiet zoey 101!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by karla — January 9, 2008 #
I AM GOING TO MISS YOUR SHOW ZOEY 101!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by KARE — January 8, 2008 #
So what if Jamie is or is not pregnant it’s her body let her do whatever she wants with it.
Comment by Regina — January 4, 2008 #
THEY SHOULD NOT CANCEL ZOEY 101!!!!!
Comment by kelsey — January 4, 2008 #
LOOK YA’LL LEAVE HER ALONE SHE IS TO YOUR TO BE HAVING SEX BUT SHE IS A CELEBRTY SO LEAVE HER TO HER MOTHER AND LET HER DEAL WITH IT OK IT MAKE’S IT WORSE COMING FROM HER FANS!!!!IM ne of her fans and i support her but she has to learn from her accidents i mean look at vanessa she made a accident but her fan’s still support her!!!!!!SO LEAVE HER ALONE!!!!!!!!!!AND I MEAN IT TTYL
Comment by kelsey — January 4, 2008 #
I think that everyone should leave her alone.. Everyone keeps saying she is way too young to be having sex, but everyone in high school is wondering bout it or doing it.. It was a careless mistake.. No need to make a huge deal bout something that is normal.. If she was just a regular girl it wouldnt make a difference.. Just bc she famous is why everyone thinks its so wrong..
Comment by Jenny — January 1, 2008 #
i think Jamie Lynn is definitely too young to have sex. She is only 16!! I’m 14 and have never thought about this. They should totally cancel “Zoey 101″
Comment by Morgan — December 31, 2007 #
Jamie would have had to be at least three weeks pregnant back in July 28th to have known about it. That would make her about 22 weeks pregnant today. Not likely.
No point in suing her. They can’t proof she was pregnant then, that she knew she about it, or that lying about a ‘rumor’ in anyway hurt their reputations. Denying something which someone else might have said isn’t going to hurt the magazine.
Comment by BW022 — December 21, 2007 #
i think that jamie is way to young to be having sex. she should think about school rightnow until shes done with it, then she can start thinking about her future.
Comment by Angela — December 19, 2007 #