Daniel Radcliffe Full Frontal Nude Shot - Equus
Posted on February 22, 2007 at 8:49 pm (PST)
The producers of Daniel Radcliffe’s revival of Equus are looking to transfer the show to Broadway in the fall. In the meantime you can check out what you’ll be missing in case you don’t see the show. Daniel is fully nude in the show, and I guess it’s his way of saying he’s all grown up now, but you’re still going to need a magnifying glass to see the money shot here, and binoculars at the show. Some say this picture is a fake. Click here to see the NSFW full frontal shot. You can see the butt shot here.
Related posts:
Tags: Daniel Radcliffe
20 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
© Copyright Hollywood Grind 2006 - 2008. All rights reserved.
He’s not 18, he’s still 17.
Comment by ginger — February 28, 2007 #
“isn’t that child pornography?” Not in the UK, where the age of consent is lower.
“WOW HIS PENIS IS SHORT FOR HIS AGE” You wish! That’s flaccid, buddy, and not short.
Comment by me — February 28, 2007 #
a very brave young actor. Bravo for him and HIM.
Comment by jim — February 28, 2007 #
John is so jealous
Comment by steve — February 28, 2007 #
Id so do it
Comment by Jack — February 28, 2007 #
The Legal Age of adulthood in Britain is 16, so its technically not child porn, and even if that isnt the case, hes 18 now XD
I bet all his fangirls are crying, thinking he was hung like a hippogriff, hes got guts i tell ya, to go against his image, Hes Daniel Radcliffe, Not Harry Potter.
Comment by Weeeeeeee — February 27, 2007 #
WOW HIS PENIS IS SHORT FOR HIS AGE
Comment by John — February 26, 2007 #
Evidently Kyah does not understand the socio-legal concept of artistic merit. In most civilized countries, it is only deemed child pornography if it depicts children involved in sexual acts, with excemptions for the educational, scientific, and artistic communities.
Comment by James — February 26, 2007 #
hehe … he’s got a little pig in a blanket …
Comment by Jill — February 23, 2007 #
now that’s just gross
o_O
Comment by Kim — February 23, 2007 #