<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avril Lavigne Stole Music From Chantal Kreviazuk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/</link>
	<description>Hollywood Grind is an edgy blog specializing in celebrity scandal, juicy gossip, and trainwrecks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:58:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/comment-page-1/#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/2007/07/03/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>Any listener can hear that Avril mimics Chantal&#039;s singing style. Initially I thought Avril a talented singer in her own right, but in her latest work she&#039;s sounds like a mini-Chantal, which I&#039;m sure Chantal finds grating. Stick to your own style Avril! And Avril should have  known better than to title her piece the exact same as Chantal&#039;s. There&#039;s no excuse for poor memory (i.e. &quot;oops - it was sent to me so long ago, i forgot.&quot;) She could have selected another single word to capture the meaning of her song...but obviously took the easy route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any listener can hear that Avril mimics Chantal&#8217;s singing style. Initially I thought Avril a talented singer in her own right, but in her latest work she&#8217;s sounds like a mini-Chantal, which I&#8217;m sure Chantal finds grating. Stick to your own style Avril! And Avril should have  known better than to title her piece the exact same as Chantal&#8217;s. There&#8217;s no excuse for poor memory (i.e. &#8220;oops &#8211; it was sent to me so long ago, i forgot.&#8221;) She could have selected another single word to capture the meaning of her song&#8230;but obviously took the easy route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bret Fahlman</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/comment-page-1/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bret Fahlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/2007/07/03/avril-lavigne-stole-music-from-chantal-kreviazuk/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>The sad thing is that Chantal only tells part of the story here, and it&#039;s a blatant misrepresentation. Lyrically and musically Avril&#039;s &quot;Contagious&quot; shares nothing with Chantal&#039;s submission, only the titles are the same. Nobody, not even the mighty Chantal Kreviazuk, has sole ownership of a single word title. That&#039;s the real reason why she doesn&#039;t sue, there&#039;s nothing to sue about and she knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing is that Chantal only tells part of the story here, and it&#8217;s a blatant misrepresentation. Lyrically and musically Avril&#8217;s &#8220;Contagious&#8221; shares nothing with Chantal&#8217;s submission, only the titles are the same. Nobody, not even the mighty Chantal Kreviazuk, has sole ownership of a single word title. That&#8217;s the real reason why she doesn&#8217;t sue, there&#8217;s nothing to sue about and she knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>