The sad thing is that Chantal only tells …

  Share  

Comment posted Avril Lavigne Stole Music From Chantal Kreviazuk by Jason Bret Fahlman.

The sad thing is that Chantal only tells part of the story here, and it’s a blatant misrepresentation. Lyrically and musically Avril’s “Contagious” shares nothing with Chantal’s submission, only the titles are the same. Nobody, not even the mighty Chantal Kreviazuk, has sole ownership of a single word title. That’s the real reason why she doesn’t sue, there’s nothing to sue about and she knows it.

powered by HollywoodGrind


Posted on July 3, 2007 at 4:00 pm(PST)

2 Responses to “The sad thing is that Chantal only tells …”

  1. Diane says:

    Any listener can hear that Avril mimics Chantal’s singing style. Initially I thought Avril a talented singer in her own right, but in her latest work she’s sounds like a mini-Chantal, which I’m sure Chantal finds grating. Stick to your own style Avril! And Avril should have known better than to title her piece the exact same as Chantal’s. There’s no excuse for poor memory (i.e. “oops – it was sent to me so long ago, i forgot.”) She could have selected another single word to capture the meaning of her song…but obviously took the easy route.

  2. The sad thing is that Chantal only tells part of the story here, and it’s a blatant misrepresentation. Lyrically and musically Avril’s “Contagious” shares nothing with Chantal’s submission, only the titles are the same. Nobody, not even the mighty Chantal Kreviazuk, has sole ownership of a single word title. That’s the real reason why she doesn’t sue, there’s nothing to sue about and she knows it.

© Copyright Hollywood Grind 2006 - 2009. All rights reserved.